On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:37 AM, >> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> PMIC mfd driver only exports first level irq for thermal device. >>> But currently we are reading the irqs from the second level irq >>> chip, So this patch fixes this issue by adding support to use >>> first level PMIC thermal irq. >>> >> >> Shouldn't be this squashed to patch 2? > > There is no compilation dependency between patch 2 and 3. But they are > functionally dependent. > > Should we squash functionally dependent patches too ? Let's assume we applied patches 1 and 2, does it mean the regression to the existing behaviour? (For example, device worked improperly in some cases -> stopped working completely) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
