Hi,
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:37 AM,
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> PMIC mfd driver only exports first level irq for thermal device.
>> But currently we are reading the irqs from the second level irq
>> chip, So this patch fixes this issue by adding support to use
>> first level PMIC thermal irq.
>>
>
> Shouldn't be this squashed to patch 2?
There is no compilation dependency between patch 2 and 3. But they are
functionally dependent.
Should we squash functionally dependent patches too ?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> * None
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> * Rebased on top of latest release.
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> * Rebased on top of latest release.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c
>> index 0f19a39..ef6b322 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c
>> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int pmic_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> regmap = pmic->regmap;
>> - regmap_irq_chip = pmic->irq_chip_data_level2;
>> + regmap_irq_chip = pmic->irq_chip_data;
>>
>> pmic_irq_count = 0;
>> while ((irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, pmic_irq_count)) != -ENXIO) {
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
--
Sathya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
