On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:19:17AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-05-11 02:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> >On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 12:07 -0500, Bin Liu wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:42:27AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>>We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
> >>>TX and RX.
> >>>If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
> >>>transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
> >>>
> >>>To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
> >[]
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
> >[]
> >>>@@ -389,15 +389,19 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
> >>> if (chdat->tx) {
> >>> /* Send transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
> >>>- musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
> >>>- chdat->transfer_packet_sz);
> >>>+ u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
> >>
> >>checkpatch.pl complains about declaration and assignment together.
> >
> >No it doesn't.
>
> It 'only' complains about:
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
It was it. My bad, I was multi-tasking and didn't read the log
carefully.
>
> which is valid.
So will you update the patch to move the declaration to the beginning of
the function to avoid this WARNING. I would just fix it locally if you
prefer.
Regards,
-Bin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
