Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: host: xhci-ring: don't need to clear interrupt pending for MSI enabled hcd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On 27.04.2017 12:49, Peter Chen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 04:20:43PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
According to xHCI spec Figure 30: Interrupt Throttle Flow Diagram

	If PCI Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI or MSI-X) are enabled,
        	then the assertion of the Interrupt Pending (IP) flag in Figure 30
        	generates a PCI Dword write. The IP flag is automatically cleared
        	by the completion of the PCI write.

the MSI enabled HCs don't need to clear interrupt pending bit, but
hcd->irq = 0 doesn't equal to MSI enabled HCD. At some Dual-role
controller software designs, it sets hcd->irq as 0 to avoid HCD
requesting interrupt, and they want to decide when to call usb_hcd_irq
by software.

ping...


This start to look like xhci msi(x) needs a bigger cleanup.
The msi parts should probably be moved to xhci-pci.c, and let
xhci_try_enable_msi() be pci specific.

xhci platform drivers should not need to worry about msi.


Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
---
Mathias, I am not very sure if the comments I delete is complete
useless, plese help to check.

  drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 5 +----
  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c      | 5 +++--
  include/linux/usb/hcd.h      | 1 +
  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index d9936c7..f5adbb3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -2642,12 +2642,9 @@ irqreturn_t xhci_irq(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
  	 */
  	status |= STS_EINT;
  	writel(status, &xhci->op_regs->status);
-	/* FIXME when MSI-X is supported and there are multiple vectors */
-	/* Clear the MSI-X event interrupt status */

-	if (hcd->irq) {
+	if (!hcd->msi_enabled) {
  		u32 irq_pending;
-		/* Acknowledge the PCI interrupt */
  		irq_pending = readl(&xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
  		irq_pending |= IMAN_IP;
  		writel(irq_pending, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 1828695..dc81041 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -401,9 +401,10 @@ static int xhci_try_enable_msi(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
  		/* fall back to msi*/
  		ret = xhci_setup_msi(xhci);

-	if (!ret)
-		/* hcd->irq is 0, we have MSI */
+	if (!ret) {
+		hcd->msi_enabled = 1;
  		return 0;
+	}

  	if (!pdev->irq) {
  		xhci_err(xhci, "No msi-x/msi found and no IRQ in BIOS\n");
diff --git a/include/linux/usb/hcd.h b/include/linux/usb/hcd.h
index a469999..50398b6 100644
--- a/include/linux/usb/hcd.h
+++ b/include/linux/usb/hcd.h
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct usb_hcd {
  	unsigned		rh_registered:1;/* is root hub registered? */
  	unsigned		rh_pollable:1;	/* may we poll the root hub? */
  	unsigned		msix_enabled:1;	/* driver has MSI-X enabled? */
+	unsigned		msi_enabled:1;	/* driver has MSI enabled? */
  	unsigned		remove_phy:1;	/* auto-remove USB phy */

  	/* The next flag is a stopgap, to be removed when all the HCDs
--

so after this
hcd->irq > 0 	means a "legacy" interrupt is used.
hcd->irq == 0 	means anything else than "legacy" is used, might be nothing as well
msi_enabled 	means msi or msix is in use
msix_enabled 	means msix is in use

This probably works, but moving msi to be xhci-pci specific feels like a better way
to fix this, but might end up as a more work

-Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux