Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] phylib MMD accessor cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:30:38PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 03/19/17 à 03:59, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit :
> > This series of patches does exactly that - we merge the functionality
> > of the indirect accesses into the clause 45 accessors, and use these
> > exclusively to access MMD registers.  Internally, the new clause
> > independent MMD accessors indirect via the PHY drivers read_mmd/write_mmd
> > methods if present, otherwise fall back to using clause 45 accesses if
> > the PHY is a clause 45 phy, or clause 22 indirect accesses if the PHY
> > is clause 22.
> 
> LGTM:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.  When I posted this last time around (19th Jan) I mentioned
about marking the old _indirect() accessors with __deprecated - is
that still something we want to do?

I haven't tested this against net-next yet, so I don't know if there
are any new users of the indirect accessors - going down the deprecated
route would avoid breakage, but means having to submit a patch later to
actually remove them.

How would people want this handled?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux