On 1/27/2017 6:53 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on ARM STi platform, since v4.10-rc1, when booting
>>>>>>>>>>>> B2260 or B2120 STi boards platform
>>>>>>>>>>>> with nothing plugged on USB3 connector, i observed the following
>>>>>>>>>>>> kernel logs :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 801.953836] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB
>>>>>>>>>>>> cable is bad?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's odd, why does it try to reset the port if there's nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> there?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 801.960455] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Cannot set link state.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This makes sense, nothing is connected, and we try to set link to
>>>>>>>>>>> U3 (PORT_PE == 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 801.966611] usb usb6-port1: cannot disable (err = -32)
>>>>>>>>>>> xhci reutns -EPIPE as we try to set link state to U3 while port
>>>>>>>>>>> is not enabled (PORT_PE == 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 806.083772] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB
>>>>>>>>>>>> cable is bad?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Again, about 5 seconds later the same port is reset, while
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing is connected.
>>>>>>>>>>> Odd
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 806.090370] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Cannot set link state.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 806.096494] usb usb6-port1: cannot disable (err = -32)
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 810.208766] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB
>>>>>>>>>>>> cable is bad?
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 810.215374] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Cannot set link state.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 810.221478] usb usb6-port1: cannot disable (err = -32)
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 814.333767] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB
>>>>>>>>>>>> cable is bad?
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ 814.340364] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Cannot set link state.
>>>>>>>>>>>> .....
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another interesting thing is even if i plugged a device (a mass
>>>>>>>>>>>> storage device in my case) on the USB3 connector,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the above logs continue to appear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is due to commit 37be66767e3ca "usb: hub: Fix auto-remount
>>>>>>>>>>>> of safely removed or ejected USB-3 devices".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if STi platforms are the only impacted by this issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On v4.9 everything was ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Was there not a single "Cannot enable. Maybe USB cable is bad"
>>>>>>>>>>> message with 4.9?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no "Cannot enable. Maybe USB cable is bad" message with 4.9
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Before commit 37be66767e3ca we forced the port to RxDetect state
>>>>>>>>>>> via Disabled state,
>>>>>>>>>>> and cleared port change flags when a usb3_port_disable() was called.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> after we just set the port to U3. Maybe those STi platforms
>>>>>>>>>>> depend on that cycle somehow?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I really don't know :-(
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Could you take logs (dmesg) of both 4.9 and 4.10-rc1 with both
>>>>>>>>>>> usb core and xhci debugging enabled:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> echo -n 'module xhci_hcd =p' >
>>>>>>>>>>> /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>>>>>>>>>>> echo 'module usbcore =p' >/sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You will find below the 2 requested logs, in both case , no USB
>>>>>>>>>> cable are plugged.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v4.9 dmesg logs :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .....
>>>>>>>>>> [ 31.368022] hub 6-0:1.0: hub_resume
>>>>>>>>>> [ 31.368064] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual
>>>>>>>>>> port 0 status = 0x400340
>>>>>>>>>> [ 31.368071] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned
>>>>>>>>>> 0x400340
>>>>>>>>>> [ 31.368224] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0000
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks like port is stuck in Compliance mode, this should only
>>>>>>>>> happen if a connect was detected,
>>>>>>>>> moving the port from RxDetect to Polling, and then timeout on
>>>>>>>>> polling to get to compliance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 4.9 is then stuck in a hub_suspend/resume loop with a port in
>>>>>>>>> compliance mode.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v4.10-rc1 dmesg logs :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>> [ 269.436617] usb usb6-port1: cannot disable (err = -32)
>>>>>>>>>> [ 269.464728] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
>>>>>>>>>> [ 269.464756] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual
>>>>>>>>>> port 0 status = 0x340
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I 4.10-rc1 we are again stuck in Compliance mode, but this time
>>>>>>>>> there was a event (00002) visible, maybe because
>>>>>>>>> the flags were not cleared or some other reason. Now are stuck in a
>>>>>>>>> port reset loop with the
>>>>>>>>> port in compliance mode.
>>>>>>>>> So the real question is why is the port in compliance mode when
>>>>>>>>> there are no devices connected.?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll continue looking at this more tomorrow
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So with both 4.9 and 4.10-rc the ports are in Compliance mode state,
>>>>>>>> even if nothing is connected
>>>>>>>> To me this looks like the real underlying issue. For some reason it
>>>>>>>> didn't try to reset the port in 4.9,
>>>>>>>> and never got to the loop of port reset.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In 4.9 the hub->events_bits[0] are not set, so the hub thread won't
>>>>>>>> even ask for port status
>>>>>>>> on any ports.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In 4.10-rc the hub->events_bits[0] is set for port 1, It will start
>>>>>>>> handling port events, see the
>>>>>>>> compliance state and try to warm reset the port, and fail as it
>>>>>>>> never sees port
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any chance you could add extra debugging to xhci to show why the
>>>>>>>> change bit is set?
>>>>>>>> Something like this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>>>>>>> index 0ef1690..e425d82 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -1271,6 +1271,10 @@ int xhci_hub_status_data(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
>>>>>>>> char *buf)
>>>>>>>> jiffies, bus_state->resume_done[i]))) {
>>>>>>>> buf[(i + 1) / 8] |= 1 << (i + 1) % 8;
>>>>>>>> status = 1;
>>>>>>>> + xhci_err(xhci, "portsc 0x%x,
>>>>>>>> port_c_suspend:%d, resume_done:%d\n",
>>>>>>>> + temp,
>>>>>>>> + bus_state->port_c_suspend,
>>>>>>>> + bus_state->resume_done[i]);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> if ((temp & PORT_RC))
>>>>>>>> reset_change = true;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and run with 4.9 and 4.10-rc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Mathias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Mathias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your time
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For information i replaced xhci_err() by xhci_dbg() to avoid flooding
>>>>>>> kernel log which
>>>>>>> avoid to complete the kernel boot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please find attached both kernel log files for v4.9 and v4.10-rc1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In v4.9_xhci-hub_additionnal_debug.txt, at the beginning of the trace
>>>>>>> portsc value is 0xa400340, then at [ 18.366392] it becomes 0x400340
>>>>>>> (link state change) and then 0x2802a0 and back again to 0xa400340
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In v4.10-rc1_xhci-hub_additionnal_debug.txt, at the beginning of the
>>>>>>> trace
>>>>>>> portsc value is 0xa400340, then at [ 5.557976] it becomes 0x400340
>>>>>>> (link state change), and then 0x2802a0 or 0x680340 for ever ....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrice
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Mathias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did new logs give you some clue about the XHCi problem ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Only that both cases, 4.9 and 4.10, start with port in compliance state
>>>>> in a
>>>>> auto suspend/resume. At some point the hub thread will see an event for
>>>>> that
>>>>> port and try to reset it. fail (as there is no device) and disable the
>>>>> port.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> log snippet of busylooping between autosuspend and resume, similar for
>>>>> both 4.9 and
>>>>> 4.10:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 18.329121] hub 6-0:1.0: hub_suspend
>>>>> [ 18.329175] usb usb6: bus auto-suspend, wakeup 1
>>>>> [ 18.329193] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0xa400340,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 18.329202] usb usb6: suspend raced with wakeup event
>>>>> [ 18.329209] usb usb6: usb auto-resume
>>>>> [ 18.332758] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0xa400340,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 18.344140] hub 6-0:1.0: hub_resume
>>>>> [ 18.344179] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x400340
>>>>> [ 18.344191] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x400340
>>>>> [ 18.344318] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0000
>>>>> [ 18.344368] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: set port remote wake mask,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0xe400340
>>>>> [ 18.344451] hub 6-0:1.0: hub_suspend
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In 4.9 we go back to the beginning, busylooping between auto suspend and
>>>>> resume,
>>>>> until after some random time when hub sees an event again, and continues
>>>>> all over again.
>>>>>
>>>>> log snippet of event, and resetting the port for 4.9:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 18.367378] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
>>>>> [ 18.367417] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x400340
>>>>> [ 18.367426] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x400340
>>>>> [ 18.367805] usb usb6-port1: link state change
>>>>> [ 18.367846] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port link state change,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0x340
>>>>> [ 18.367943] usb usb6-port1: do warm reset
>>>>> [ 18.368043] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
>>>>> [ 18.428313] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2b0
>>>>> [ 18.428330] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x2b0
>>>>> [ 18.428475] usb usb6-port1: not warm reset yet, waiting 50ms
>>>>> [ 18.468135] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Port Status Change Event for
>>>>> port 2
>>>>> [ 18.468155] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: handle_port_status: starting
>>>>> port polling.
>>>>> [ 18.468167] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0x2802a0,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 18.487840] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2802e0
>>>>> [ 18.487855] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x3002e0
>>>>> [ 18.488636] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port reset change, actual
>>>>> port 0 status = 0x802e0
>>>>> [ 18.488736] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port warm(BH) reset
>>>>> change, actual port 0 status = 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.488803] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port link state change,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.488869] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port connect change,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.489012] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.489026] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.489112] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.489122] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x2e0
>>>>> [ 18.489182] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Disable port 0
>>>>> [ 18.489239] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x280
>>>>> [ 18.489247] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x280
>>>>> [ 18.489296] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Enable port 0
>>>>> [ 18.489357] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
>>>>> [ 18.489386] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2a0
>>>>> [ 18.489395] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x2a0
>>>>> [ 18.489489] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: set port remote wake mask,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0xe0002a0
>>>>> [ 18.489547] hub 6-0:1.0: hub_suspend
>>>>> [ 18.489606] usb usb6: bus auto-suspend, wakeup 1
>>>>> [ 18.489624] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: xhci_hub_status_data: stopping
>>>>> port polling.
>>>>> [ 18.522772] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: xhci_hub_status_data: stopping
>>>>> port polling.
>>>>> [ 18.543748] Link is Up - 1000/Full
>>>>> [ 18.863014] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Port Status Change Event for
>>>>> port 2
>>>>> [ 18.863033] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: resume root hub
>>>>> [ 18.863073] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: handle_port_status: starting
>>>>> port polling.
>>>>> [ 18.863089] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0xa400340,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 18.863333] usb usb6: usb wakeup-resume
>>>>> [ 18.863355] usb usb6: usb auto-resume
>>>>> [ 18.863379] hub 6-0:1.0: hub_resume
>>>>> [ 18.863410] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x400340
>>>>> [ 18.863419] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x400340
>>>>>
>>>>> In 4.10 the port disable is a bit different, so after hub sees the first
>>>>> event (evt 0002) and tries to
>>>>> reset the port, it will notice the reset fails, and try to reset port
>>>>> several timer, then disable device,
>>>>> which will end up with another event (evt 0002) and we start the whole
>>>>> reset loop again.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 5.558058] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
>>>>> [ 5.558093] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x400340
>>>>> [ 5.558103] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x400340
>>>>> [ 5.558187] usb usb6-port1: link state change
>>>>> [ 5.558221] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port link state change,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0x340
>>>>> [ 5.558278] usb usb6-port1: do warm reset
>>>>> [ 5.558437] systemd-journald[108]: /dev/kmsg buffer overrun, some
>>>>> messages lost.
>>>>> [ 5.623028] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2b0
>>>>> [ 5.623046] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x2b0
>>>>> [ 5.623134] usb usb6-port1: not warm reset yet, waiting 50ms
>>>>> [ 5.658454] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Port Status Change Event for
>>>>> port 2
>>>>> [ 5.658471] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: handle_port_status: starting
>>>>> port polling.
>>>>> [ 5.658487] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0x2802a0,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 5.683071] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2802e0
>>>>> [ 5.683088] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x3002e0
>>>>> [ 5.683187] usb usb6-port1: not warm reset yet, waiting 200ms
>>>>> [ 5.777987] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0x2802e0,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 5.894043] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2802e0
>>>>> [ 5.894061] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x3002e0
>>>>> [ 5.894158] usb usb6-port1: not warm reset yet, waiting 200ms
>>>>> [ 6.027992] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0x2802e0,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 6.103092] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x680340
>>>>> [ 6.103110] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x700340
>>>>> [ 6.103238] usb usb6-port1: not warm reset yet, waiting 200ms
>>>>> [ 6.277993] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: portsc 0x680340,
>>>>> port_c_suspend:0, resume_done:0
>>>>> [ 6.313066] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x680340
>>>>> [ 6.313085] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x700340
>>>>> [ 6.313349] usb usb6-port1: not warm reset yet, waiting 200ms
>>>>> [ 6.313385] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port reset change, actual
>>>>> port 0 status = 0x480340
>>>>> [ 6.313464] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port warm(BH) reset
>>>>> change, actual port 0 status = 0x400340
>>>>> [ 6.313523] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port link state change,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0x340
>>>>> [ 6.313587] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: clear port connect change,
>>>>> actual port 0 status = 0x340
>>>>> [ 6.313651] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x340
>>>>> [ 6.313665] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x340
>>>>> ..loop a few times, until
>>>>> [ 9.673761] usb usb6-port1: not enabled, trying warm reset again...
>>>>> [ 9.673771] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?
>>>>> [ 9.680418] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Cannot set link state.
>>>>> [ 9.722276] usb usb6-port1: cannot disable (err = -32)
>>>>> [ 9.754240] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
>>>>> [ 9.754291] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x340
>>>>> [ 9.754304] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: Get port status returned 0x340
>>>>> [ 9.754419] usb usb6-port1: do warm reset
>>>>> [ 9.782987] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: xhci_hub_status_data: stopping
>>>>> port polling.
>>>>> [ 9.813087] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.0.auto: get port status, actual port 0
>>>>> status = 0x2b0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We could try things like clearing all port change flags in ports
>>>>> disable, and/or only move ports
>>>>> in xhci enabled state to U3 at port disable, from other states we would
>>>>> do like in 4.9, and
>>>>> move to RxDetect via disable.
>>>>>
>>>>> But this would not really solve the STi case, it would at best go back
>>>>> to 4.9 where the issue is
>>>>> better hidden and silently stay in the autosuspend/resume busyloop with
>>>>> port in Compliance mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> You really should focus on why the port link state is in compliance in
>>>>> the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Mathias
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mathias
>>>>
>>>> +Felipe Balbi
>>>>
>>>> I did further test on previous kernel release.
>>>> On v4.7, everything was ok , first issue appeared with v4.8-rc1 kernel.
>>>>
>>>> After bisection, the issue was introduced by
>>>> c499ff71ff usb: dwc3: core: re-factor init and exit paths
>>>>
>>>> If dwc3_phy_setup() call is moved back in dwc3_probe() instead of
>>>> dwc3_core_init(), everything is ok on STMicroelectronics platforms.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if this issue has been seen on another platform.
>>>>
>>>> I can send a fix for this, but i wanted to get Felipe opinion on this.
>>>
>>> That really shouldn't cause any issues for xHCI. We're initializing the
>>> PHYs a little later, but still way before xHCI has a chance of
>>> probing. Are you sure your bisection is sound?
>>
>> Hi Felipe
>>
>> I confirm the bisection was correct
>>
>>> Which PHY driver are you
>>
>> The phy used is drivers/phy/phy-miphy28lp.c.
>>
>>> using? Maybe you have some quirk flag missing?
>>>
>>
>> Checking the available quirk flags for snps dwc3 and
>> re-reading what Mathias indicated me, he noticed that
>> xhci try to set link in U3 and returns an error,
>> i saw that "snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk" could help.
>>
>> I then set "snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk" in our board DT which fix
>> the issue.
>>
>> Felipe, thanks for the tips
>> Mathias, thanks for your time ;-)
>
> John, another instance of SUSPHY bit messing up with host side :-s
>
What is the exact failure? Is it a command timing out after going into
U3 like before?
Typically the PHY going to U3 should not affect the controller. But
there could be a design issue. For example if the RAM clock is derived
from the PHY clock. Again check the design and the GCTL.RAMCLKSEL.
Another possibility is if the driver tries to issue a command to the
controller that requires the link when in U3. But we've never seen
this.
Regards,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
