On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Axel Haslam wrote: > >> To be able to use regulator to handle the overcurrent pin, i need to be able >> to somehow retrieve the over current pin state from the regulator driver. > > What makes you say that, none of the existing users need this? > >> As i was trying your suggestion, i remembered why i thought i should use >> mode instead of status: Status seems to be for internal regulator driver use, >> there is no regulator_get_status, function and REGULATOR_STATUS_* are defined >> in driver.h and not in consumer.h as REGULATOR_MODE_* > >> Would you be ok if i allow consumers to get the status via a new >> "regulator_get_status" call? > > What would they do with this information that they can't do with the > existing error notification? the usb core relies in two flags that need too be set properly, one is the over-current indicator RH_PS_POCI , and the other is the over current indicator "change" (RH_PS_OCIC). The idea was to use the notification to set the over current indicator "change" flag, which will happen for both rising and falling edges. And to use get_status or get_mode to set the over-current indicator flag which should reflect the actual pin status. -Axel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
