On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 13:44 -0400, Robert Foss wrote: > > On 2016-08-03 06:39 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 10:37 -0400, Robert Foss wrote: > > How can that depend on what we return to user space? > > In the driver we can continue just ignoring errors. > > Now, if user space stops reading because we reported an error, > > that is the decision user space has made. We cannot ignore errors > > in the kernel because we don't like what user space does when it > > sees the error. > > So perhaps the better solution is to be more intelligent about how > desc->rerr is written to during after an error to be able to maintain > the error condition? Yes, good idea. I think an error condition should never be overwritten. So we go to the current behaviour only if a second error before user space has seen the3 first error arises. Would that fix your issue? Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
