On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 09:54 -0400, Robert Foss wrote: > > On 2016-08-02 08:23 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 14:19 -0400, robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Prathmesh Prabhu <pprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Implemented queued response handling. This queue is processed every > >> time the > >> WDM_READ flag is cleared. > >> > >> In case of a read error, userspace may not actually read the data, > >> since the > >> driver returns an error through wdm_poll. After this, the underlying > >> device may > >> attempt to send us more data, but the queue is not processed. While > >> userspace is > >> also blocked, because the read error is never cleared. > > > > Could you explain why user space cannot just read more data? > > That will clear the error. > > Userspace certainly could read more data, but for the case when > userspace doesn't read and clear a potential an error, we still would > like to not be stuck if the device sends more data. > > I hope that answers your question, if not I'll try to be more elaborate. Clear, but why does that require the suppression of an error condition? errors should always be delivered. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
