On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:17:12PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Peter Chen (2016-06-29 04:29:25)
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:28:34AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > @@ -204,7 +201,7 @@ static int ci_hdrc_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > of_node_put(ulpi_node);
> > >
> > > plat_ci = ci_hdrc_add_device(&pdev->dev, pdev->resource,
> > > - pdev->num_resources, &ci_hdrc_msm_platdata);
> > > + pdev->num_resources, &ci->pdata);
> > > if (IS_ERR(plat_ci)) {
> > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ci_hdrc_add_device failed!\n");
> > > ret = PTR_ERR(plat_ci);
> >
> > You can do something like ci_hdrc_usb2.c, it looks simpler.
> >
>
> Do what exactly? I'd rather not do a structure copy because that wastes
> some memory for a structure that is just a template. We add some more
> code here to assign values directly, but that is smaller size wise than
> the large platdata structure that only has a few values set in it.
But you add one struct ci_hdrc_platform_data pdata entry at struct
ci_hdrc_msm which needs to allocate the memory too. Anyway, it is not a
big problem.
Acked-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
