On Friday 23 January 2009, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > NAK -- interpretation of the MODE parameter is correct > > (though it's not clear to me that the callers set it right), > > but this won't apply to current GIT since the code differs. > > hmmm.. don't get what you mean. If mode parameter in channel_program() > is true, that means channel->desired_mode should be true and we're > trying to kick mode1 dma, isn't it ?? What I mean is: you're working on "mode1 DMA" (multiple packets per request, the only sane mode, when it works) ... and I know you've had a hard time getting it all to behave. Ergo it's not clear to me that Ajay's patch could be sufficient. If it were, then you've been spending a LOT of time on something very simple ... ;) The "desired_mode" thing is confusing too; it's TX vs RX, unrelated to "mode1" or "mode0", but that's a separate naming issue. - Dave > > But true, should be re-issued > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
