Re: Minor xhci issues (failed to peer) on Dell XPS 13 9350 (Skylake)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:46 AM,  <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 1:41 PM
>>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski
>>> <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; USB
>>> list <linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mathias Nyman
>>> <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxx>; Dominguez, Jared
>>> <Jared_Dominguez@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: Minor xhci issues (failed to peer) on Dell XPS 13 9350 (Skylake)
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Mario Limonciello
>>> <mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 03/12/2016 02:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Got it.  I was barking up the wrong tree.
>>> >>
>>> >> Q: What happens if _Q66 runs concurrently with itself:
>>> >>
>>> >> A:
>>> >>
>>> >>             Method (_Q66, 0, NotSerialized)  // _Qxx: EC Query
>>> >>             {
>>> >>                 Acquire (PATM, 0x0064)
>>> >>                 If ((ECRD != One))
>>> >>                 {
>>> >>                     Return (Zero)
>>> >>                 }
>>> >>
>>> >>                 NEVT ()
>>> >>                 Release (PATM)
>>> >>                 Return (Zero)
>>> >>             }
>>> >>
>>> >> The first one acquires PATM.  The second one fails to acquire PATM due
>>> >> to the timeout, does something potentially harmful when it reenters
>>> >> NEVT (not sure -- maybe it's fine), then blows up when it tries to
>>> >> release PATM, which it doesn't hold.
>>> >>
>>> >> --Andy
>>> > Andy,
>>> >
>>> > Our team has confirmed this mistake and will issue a fix in a future
>>> > BIOS.  For now if you want to build your own DSDT to see if this is
>>> > causing your type-C problems the Release(PATM) will be inserted in the
>>> > obvious location.
>>> >
>>> > FWIW this issue will affect many platforms in this generation.  (XPS
>>> > 9550, XPS 9350, Precision 5510, and more)
>>> >
>>>
>>> FYI: the H_EC.CHRG issue seems to be fixed in 1.4.3.  The PATM issue
>>> is still there by inspection of the code, although I haven't gotten
>>> unlucky enough to trigger it yet.
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up.  I'll poke the team and find out if it was pushed
>> out, or it was a different fix than previously planned.  If you trigger it and
>> it's still leading to any problems let me know.
>>
>
>
> I hit it again.  I haven't seen any observable problem yet, but I also
> don't have anything connected to the USB-C port right now.  (I don't
> know what _Q66 is used for, so maybe it has nothing to do with USB-C.
> But it's certainly not doing whatever it's supposed to do correctly
> given this bug.
>
> [  +0.037295] ACPI Error: Cannot release Mutex [PATM], not acquired
> (20160108/exmutex-393)
>
> [  +0.000011] No Local Variables are initialized for method [_Q66]
>
> [  +0.000002] No Arguments are initialized for method [_Q66]
>
> [  +0.000003] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed
> [\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.ECDV._Q66] (Node ffff8802760ec8c0), AE_AML_MUTEX_NOT_A
>
> --Andy

I got a DA200 adapter.  When I plugged it in, it said:

[106415.096022] ACPI Error: [SPRT] Namespace lookup failure,
AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20160108/dswload2-330)

[106415.096050] No Local Variables are initialized for method [_E42]

[106415.096057] No Arguments are initialized for method [_E42]

[106415.096063] ACPI Exception: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name
lookup/catalog (20160108/psobject-227)
[106415.096071] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_GPE._E42]
(Node ffff8802760dbe38), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20160108/psparse-542)
[106415.096085] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_GPE._E42]
(Node ffff8802760dbe38), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20160108/psparse-542)
[106415.096104] ACPI Exception: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, while evaluating
GPE method [_E42] (20160108/evgpe-592)

Other than that, it seems to work, at least as far as I can tell
without connecting the other end to anything.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux