Hi, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> However, if I comment out the phy_exit()/init(), phy_power_off/on() part then >> I do see the devices resume correctly. > > okay, so in some cases we don't want phy_exit()/phy_init(), I can move > that elsewhere. Let me check. wait a minute!! phy_power_off() is done during suspend and has been done before I touched that. Hmm, it was added by an old patch of mine which you sent to me recently: 5c4ad318de3b usb: dwc3: core: fix PHY handling during suspend Are you, now, claiming that's wrong? I'm actually confused now. If that causes troubles, why was it sent for mainline? Also, I remember I wrote that to actually fix some other splats that we were having in TI's v4.1 release. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature