> No, I was trying to say that the we should not attempt to load a > firmware on the "ti_usb-v%04x-p%04x.fw" format before loading the moxa > firmware. For MTS devices (mts_*.fw) and for devices using generic firmware (ti_3410.fw and ti_5052.fw), ti_usb-v%04x-p%04x.fw loading is already failing. So, I can patch the driver to request firmwares in this order : 1. VID dependant (MTS and MOXA now) 2. ti_usb-v%04x-p%04x.fw format 3. Generic firmware But, for generic firmware users, ti_usb-v%04x-p%04x.fw loading will still always fail ... Or we can get rid of ti_usb-v%04x-p%04x.fw loading because no one has defined a firmware with this format in linux-firmware repository ? > No, that's just integer-division with rounding. Remember that the > divisions above are integer divisions so the results are actually 96 and > 8 as expected. You're right, sorry ! Thank you, Mathieu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
