Hi, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> writes: >> Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> writes: >> > On Mon 2016-04-18 13:55:17, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> But cellphone user knows what he connected his charger to, and that's >> >> >> why it is useful to be able to lower the current. Even when you said >> >> >> "less is just stupid" I demonstrated it is not, at least in case when >> >> >> >> and btw, you haven't demonstrated anything. You merely stated that it >> >> isn't without references or numbers, or any source of trustworthy >> >> information. I'm not really into 'believing'. >> > >> > You are not really into reading, either, it seems. Or into the >> > electronics. Or into physics. >> > >> > You seem to understand that charging li-ion from li-ion produces too >> > much heat. (And yes, it does, DC-DC convertors are not 100% >> > effective). Converting energy into heat is not a good idea. >> > >> > If you need numbers or references to understand basic physics, you'll >> > need to google it yourself, I'm afraid. >> >> still doesn't change the fact that you haven't demonstrated anything. If >> you can't be helpful and/or constructive, you may also go away and use >> whatever unsafe setup you want to use. > > So you still claim that it is "stupid" to charge at anything lower > than maximum allowed current? > > Even after I described the example with device running off power bank > on a train? Would you explain your reasoning? you still haven't produced evidence of your claim. Claiming without evidence has virtually no meaning. Anyway, I'll just google a bit later seen as if you're just unwilling to produce evidence of your claims. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
