On Mon 2016-04-18 14:42:58, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> writes: > > On Mon 2016-04-18 13:55:17, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> >> But cellphone user knows what he connected his charger to, and that's > >> >> why it is useful to be able to lower the current. Even when you said > >> >> "less is just stupid" I demonstrated it is not, at least in case when > >> > >> and btw, you haven't demonstrated anything. You merely stated that it > >> isn't without references or numbers, or any source of trustworthy > >> information. I'm not really into 'believing'. > > > > You are not really into reading, either, it seems. Or into the > > electronics. Or into physics. > > > > You seem to understand that charging li-ion from li-ion produces too > > much heat. (And yes, it does, DC-DC convertors are not 100% > > effective). Converting energy into heat is not a good idea. > > > > If you need numbers or references to understand basic physics, you'll > > need to google it yourself, I'm afraid. > > still doesn't change the fact that you haven't demonstrated anything. If > you can't be helpful and/or constructive, you may also go away and use > whatever unsafe setup you want to use. So you still claim that it is "stupid" to charge at anything lower than maximum allowed current? Even after I described the example with device running off power bank on a train? Would you explain your reasoning? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
