> -----Original Message----- > From: Mathias Nyman [mailto:mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 4:20 PM > To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@xxxxxxx> > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix incomplete PM resume operation due to XHCI > commmand timeout > > On 01.04.2016 06:55, Rajesh Bhagat wrote: > > >>> > >>> Please share your opinion on other changes for patch submission as > >>> well as resume > >> time. > >>> > > > >> > >> I think more effort should be put into investigating why this happens in the first > place. > >> What is the root cause? why doesn't xhci start properly after resume in this case. > >> > > Hello Mathias, > > > > I understand your point and would surely debug the root cause of the > > issue. But implementing the fallback mechanism in SW, if HW does not respond well > seems to a better solution to me. > > > > Yes, I'll add something like this, at least the xhci parts to make sure the completions > are called. > Should I send the patch? > This is not really a fallback, it's just a better burial for xhci. It will be unusable after > this. > > -Mathias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
