On Thursday 24 March 2016 12:02 AM, David Lechner wrote: > On 03/23/2016 12:29 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> >> Alright, I guess 'can be called' in the comment should have used >> stronger language :) How about late registration of USB clocks as I >> suggested. It should also help consolidate code across da830 and da850. >> > > What about the new async3 clock? It will require later registration too, > but it has many children that depend on it. I guess that was the reason why it was done the way it was. Can we leave that alone for now (not use the new set_parent interface)? You don't really need that to be changed for USB functionality, right? Thanks, sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
