On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:17:46PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches > >> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. > > > > Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be > > applied in. > > Thanks I'll send them in a numbered series again. Since the patch > series didn't have much in common(feature wise), I changed my mind > right at the last moment to send them individually but that didn't go > well. > > > > > And I always ignore RFC patches, if you can't be confident enough in > > submitting it for inclusion, why should we care? :) > > Yes I got your point. I was not intending to submit it yet, but hoping > to get any early feedback or objections from maintainers. Again, if you don't care enough to think it is submittable, why should we? :) Don't expect us to do your review and analysis work for you. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
