On 9 February 2016 at 04:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: >> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches >> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch. > > Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be > applied in. Thanks I'll send them in a numbered series again. Since the patch series didn't have much in common(feature wise), I changed my mind right at the last moment to send them individually but that didn't go well. > > And I always ignore RFC patches, if you can't be confident enough in > submitting it for inclusion, why should we care? :) Yes I got your point. I was not intending to submit it yet, but hoping to get any early feedback or objections from maintainers. > > You have of course tested these, right? I have tested some of it for regressions, though not on the latest kernel, but I will go through and re-test what I can. As I said I was mainly just hoping for early maintainer feedback here. Thank you for the suggestions and feedback Greg. Regards, Amit Pundir > > thanks, > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
