On 11/11/2015 3:20 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > Hi John, > > Am 11.11.2015 um 00:21 schrieb John Youn: >> On 11/9/2015 12:43 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: >>> Hi, >> >> The gadget side required it but it looks like the host side >> didn't. >> >> When Marek did the low-level hw refactor, some of the gadget >> stuff was brought up to the common layer, including the returning >> of -EPROBE_DEFER when no phys are defined. >> >> I think this requirement can be removed. At least only enforce it >> for the gadget as before. >> >> Could you see if the following fixes it? > > the patch looks okay, but it didn't get USB working after applying your > patch in combination with my patch. > > devm_phy_get(hsotg->dev, "usb2-phy") failed, but ret has a value of -38. > I don't know where this strange value comes from. Anyone know where the -38 (-ENOSYS) might be coming from for rpi? I couldn't see anything obvious. Do you know if any PHY is defined? > > I also experience issues with my rootfs, so i think could be a problem > with my build or the linux-next version. Tomorrow i will try the patches > on top of Felipe's repo. > Could you also try this patch that I submitted earlier which just makes the phy optional and leaves the error handling the same? http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=144727055711457&w=2 Regards, John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
