On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 21:27 +0100, Sven Brauch wrote: > On 02/11/15 12:32, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > given this test I will submit the patch. > Mind you, I don't know if the improvement is due to your patch or other > things. I didn't test the new kernel without your patch; should I? If you find the time. But testing with enlarged buffers is more important. > > Sven, can you ramp up the buffers in the manner Peter suggested > > and retest? It looks like the throttling code isn't perfect yet, > > but a larger buffer may make its performance good enough. > I'll try as soon as possible, but I'm sceptical. That still doesn't > guarantee that no data is lost, which feels bad to me. That cannot be guaranteed on a remote line. Basically your device is special by doing implied flow control when the host stops requesting data. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
