Re: mass storage behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06 Oct 2015, at 13:26, Paul Zimmerman <pauldzim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> 
>>>>> In my experience, you need to do at least the following to get max
>>>>> performance from the mass storage gadget:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Use Windows 8 or higher on the host. It's much faster than Linux.
>> 
>> Why is Windows so much faster?  Or to put it another way, why is Linux
>> slow?  How can we improve things?
> 
> I don't know. We were doing our performance demos using Windows, so we
> never looked into why Linux was slower. But I do know the Microsoft
> engineers put some effort into tuning their stack for good performance
> at USB 3.0 speeds. I don't think anyone has done that for Linux yet.
It seems that Mac OSX is faster when using a file system on an emulated device.
dd directly to the block device on my Mac gives me around 137MB/s, whilst copying data onto a mounted filesystem (also with dd) runs at over 180MB/s.

Paul.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux