On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:19:46AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:29:52PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:12:29PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:37:45AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:54:27PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > > Handle the error properly instead of calling the pci remove function.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > this doesn't apply. Where did you rebase this series ? Please rebase on my
> > > > testing/next
> > > This was done on next-20150922. I will rebase on your tree.
> > Looks like today is a day of confusion for me.
> > I asked you to discard my v1 as I saw some part of the change was done
> > by: 6527cc27761a ("usb: gadget: amd5536udc: fix error handling in udc_pci_probe()")
> >
> > But now I dont see that patch in your testing/next , but I can see that
> > patch in next-20150922. Confused. :(
> > Now?
>
> heh, let's wait a bit then, seems like I need to wait for -rc3 and merge that
> in my testing/next.
It is in your usb/fixes tree. I am not rebasing then.
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
