On Wednesday 12 August 2015 16:51:29 Jeremy Linton wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c > index 2593def..82e396f 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c > @@ -162,8 +162,10 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > > err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&dev->dev, > pdata->dma_mask_64 ? DMA_BIT_MASK(64) : DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > - if (err) > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error: DMA setup failed\n"); > return err; > + } We should really stop doing this: the platform should provide the correct dma mask when creating the device, instead of setting a bogus pdata field. Do not duplicate this bug for ACPI. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html