On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:36:50AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Lin,
>
> You can use --in-reply-to "message id of v5 of this path" so that it appears together
> with the other patches in peoples mailboxes.
>
okay, I will try that next time, thanks.
Li Jun
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:18:22 +0800
> Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Change for v6:
> > UPdate otg caps by disable flags even if otg_rev is not passed, this is
> > needed in case user wants to disable whole OTG(or just want to ID pin
> > detect).
> >
> > Check property of usb hardware to get otg version and if SRP, HNP and ADP
> > are disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/common/common.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/usb/of.h | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/common.c b/drivers/usb/common/common.c
> > index b530fd4..12f5d28 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/common/common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/common/common.c
> > @@ -154,6 +154,33 @@ bool of_usb_host_tpl_support(struct device_node *np)
> > return false;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_usb_host_tpl_support);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * of_usb_get_set_caps - to set usb otg capabilities according to
>
> get or set?
> how about update instead?
>
Should be set, update? okay.
Li Jun
> > + * the passed properties in DT.
> > + * @np: Pointer to the given device_node
> > + * @otg_caps: Pointer to the target usb_otg_caps to be set
> > + *
> > + * The function gets and sets the otg capabilities
> > + */
> > +void of_usb_set_otg_caps(struct device_node *np, struct usb_otg_caps *otg_caps)
> > +{
> > + u32 otg_rev;
> > +
> > + if (!otg_caps)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "otg-rev", &otg_rev))
> > + otg_caps->otg_rev = otg_rev;
>
> should we check if otg_rev is in correct format?
> anything non BCD and greater than 0x9999 is invalid.
>
Then that's not so simple, every number should be checked,
if ((otg_caps->otg_rev % 10) > 9) ||
((otg_caps->otg_rev >> 4) % 10) > 9) ||
((otg_caps->otg_rev >> 8) % 10) > 9) ||
((otg_caps->otg_rev >> 12) % 10) > 9))
return error;
We really need this kind of format check? seems no this check
for bcdUSB.
> Also if otg-rev is not passed then we need to treat it as legacy
> platform right? How is this taken care of?
>
> > + if (of_find_property(np, "hnp-disable", NULL))
> > + otg_caps->hnp_support = false;
> > + if (of_find_property(np, "srp-disable", NULL))
> > + otg_caps->srp_support = false;
> > + if (of_find_property(np, "adp-disable", NULL))
> > + otg_caps->adp_support = false;
>
> Don't we expect it to do basic sanity checks?
> e.g. if otg_rev < 0x200 then adp_support can't be true?
>
Okay, it's better we add a sanity check here.
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_usb_set_otg_caps);
> > +
> > #endif
> >
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/of.h b/include/linux/usb/of.h
> > index cfe0528..6339799 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/usb/of.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/usb/of.h
> > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> > enum usb_dr_mode of_usb_get_dr_mode(struct device_node *np);
> > enum usb_device_speed of_usb_get_maximum_speed(struct device_node *np);
> > bool of_usb_host_tpl_support(struct device_node *np);
> > +void of_usb_set_otg_caps(struct device_node *np,
> > + struct usb_otg_caps *otg_caps);
> > #else
> > static inline enum usb_dr_mode of_usb_get_dr_mode(struct device_node *np)
> > {
> > @@ -30,6 +32,11 @@ static inline bool of_usb_host_tpl_support(struct device_node *np)
> > {
> > return false;
> > }
> > +static inline void of_usb_set_otg_caps(struct device_node *np,
> > + struct usb_otg_caps *otg_caps)
> > +{
> > +
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT)
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
>
> cheers,
> -roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
