Hi Bjorn, >> Hmm. Oliver is marked as the maintainer of the USB CDC code, but >> others have touched it more recently. So I'm just wildly adding people >> to the cc to comment on this patch and maybe apply it. >> Oliver/David/Ben/Bjørn? > > Adding Aleksander and Dan, too. The 'wwanX' vs 'usbX' distinction is a > hint for userspace and nothing more. We try our best to make this hint > as precise as possible, but there has never been any guarantee that it > is 100% correct. So userspace will have to deal with hints being wrong. > This has been discussed before: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/modemmanager-devel/2014-April/001068.html > > What makes the Huawei NCM devices special is that the same ID is reused > for both types of devices, making it impossible to achieve perfect > hinting by adding exceptions to the generic rule. We can choose between > wrong towards 'wwanX' or wrong towards 'usbX'. But the hint WILL be > wrong in some cases no matter what we do. > > The 12d1:1506 device ID is a perfect example. Here's a report of a > Huawei E5776 which should be used as a plain 'usbX' NCM device: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/modemmanager-devel/2014-April/001040.html > And here's a report of a Huawei E3276 which needs wwan management and > therefore should be hinted as a 'wwanX' NCM device: > http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=764920 > > So which of the two wrongs should we choose? > > Huawei wanting this changed is a strong argument for the 'usbX' > direction, of course. But this will be a user visible change which is > likely to break currently working devices until userspace adapts. And > that will normally trump almost any other argument. I don't think we > can change this now. I sincerely apologise about having added the > generic rule in the first place, but I don't see how I can go back and > change that. > > I believe we have to follow the path of least surprise: Keeping what we > have. > > But we should definitely work with userspace to ensure that a wrongly > flagged 'wwanX' device is usable without any wwan management. > Preferably without the user really noticing anything different (except > possibly the device name). we introduced DEVTYPE in uevent a long time ago. That is what userspace should be using and not second guessing on interface names. Why is userspace trying to hack around the kernel anyway. This never really goes well unless the kernel exposes clear information to identify devices. If there are some weird devices, then work this out in the kernel and have DEVTYPE identity them correctly. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
