On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:42:04 +0800
Li Jun <b47624@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:55:57PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > > drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > > >
> > > > static int usb_enumerate_device_otg(struct usb_device *udev)
> > > > {
> > > > int err = 0;
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_USB_OTG
> > > > /*
> > > > * OTG-aware devices on OTG-capable root hubs may be able to use SRP,
> > > > * to wake us after we've powered off VBUS; and HNP, switching roles
> > > > * "host" to "peripheral". The OTG descriptor helps figure this out.
> > > > */
> > > > if (!udev->bus->is_b_host
> > > > && udev->config
> > > > && udev->parent == udev->bus->root_hub) {
> > > > struct usb_otg_descriptor *desc = NULL;
> > > > struct usb_bus *bus = udev->bus;
> > > >
> > > > /* descriptor may appear anywhere in config */
> > > > if (__usb_get_extra_descriptor (udev->rawdescriptors[0],
> > > > le16_to_cpu(udev->config[0].desc.wTotalLength),
> > > > USB_DT_OTG, (void **) &desc) == 0) {
> > > > if (desc->bmAttributes & USB_OTG_HNP) {
> > > > unsigned port1 = udev->portnum;
> > > >
> > > > dev_info(&udev->dev,
> > > > "Dual-Role OTG device on %sHNP port\n",
> > > > (port1 == bus->otg_port)
> > > > ? "" : "non-");
> > > >
> > > > /* enable HNP before suspend, it's simpler */
> > > > if (port1 == bus->otg_port)
> > > > bus->b_hnp_enable = 1;
> > > > err = usb_control_msg(udev,
> > > > usb_sndctrlpipe(udev, 0),
> > > > USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE, 0,
> > > > bus->b_hnp_enable
> > > > ? USB_DEVICE_B_HNP_ENABLE
> > > > : USB_DEVICE_A_ALT_HNP_SUPPORT,
> > > > 0, NULL, 0, USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT);
> > > >
> > > > We're sending out this control request even if this host port is not OTG.
> > > > Isn't that wrong?
> > >
> > > So send USB_DEVICE_A_ALT_HNP_SUPPORT request.
> > > This is correct in OTG 1.x, its intention is to remind the user who is
> > > connecting the HNP capable OTG device to a non-OTG port, He can change
> > > to another port of this machine which is a OTG port(with HNP).
> >
> > I didn't understand.
> > If CONFIG_USB_OTG is enabled doesn't mean that this USB host port is OTG host.
> Yes, only CONFIG_USB_OTG enabled doesn't mean that this USB host port
> is a OTG port, there are might multiple usb host ports, but only one
> is a OTG port.
Not necessarily. Many systems don't have any OTG port so that request cannot
be sent even if CONFIG_USB_OTG is enabled.
> > So it should not send any OTG specific request to device. Right?
> Non-otg port(in OTG 1.x protocol) + OTG 1.x device, should send,
> otherwise, should not send.
What did you mean by Non-OTG port (in OTG 1.x protocol)?
If it is Non-OTG port it doesn't understand any OTG protocol.
So Non-OTG port should not send any OTG request.
>
> So the code you pasted here was right only for OTG 1.x, I assume
> OTG 2.0 has not been released when it was designed. But now it's
> out of date, it's wrong if you connect a OTG 2.0 device.
>
The code is wrong for non-OTG ports when CONFIG_USB_OTG is set.
Peter/Felipe, any comments on this?
cheers,
-roger
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > if (err < 0) {
> > > > /* OTG MESSAGE: report errors here,
> > > > * customize to match your product.
> > > > */
> > > > dev_info(&udev->dev,
> > > > "can't set HNP mode: %d\n",
> > > > err);
> > > > bus->b_hnp_enable = 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Instead it should be moved inside the if (port1 == bus->otg_port) condition.
> > >
> > > Nope, as I explained above, this is really too detailed OTG protocol:)
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > #endif
> > > > return err;
> > > > }
> > > >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
