Re: [PATCH 01/11] usb: phy: return error on failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:28:50AM +0000, Kaukab, Yousaf wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:20 PM
> > To: Kaukab, Yousaf
> > Cc: balbi@xxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] usb: phy: return error on failure
> > 
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Kaukab, Yousaf wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 11:17 PM
> > > > To: Kaukab, Yousaf
> > > > Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; balbi@xxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] usb: phy: return error on failure
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:14:35PM +0200, Mian Yousaf Kaukab wrote:
> > > > > If the requested phy operation can't be done, return error instead
> > > > > of success to let the caller know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  include/linux/usb/phy.h | 10 +++++-----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/phy.h b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> > > > > index bc91b5d..d2b03db 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> > > > > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ usb_phy_set_power(struct usb_phy *x, unsigned
> > > > > mA) {
> > > > >  	if (x && x->set_power)
> > > > >  		return x->set_power(x, mA);
> > > > > -	return 0;
> > > > > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > >
> > > > the idea is that these operations are actually optional, so it's ok to return 0.
> > >
> > > Caller can ignore the error if its optional for it. There are others
> > 
> > ok, I have to spell it out.
> > 
> > It's not optional for the *caller*, it's optional for the PHY driver to implement
> > it.
> > 
> > > who have put the similar validity checks  before usb phy api calls
> > > because they want to return error in case the call fails. We can
> > > remove such checks by returning the error here.
> > 
> > no... what we're doing here is:
> > 
> > if the phy driver implements this call, then let's call that callback and pass
> > along any error it might return, otherwise we just return success because that
> > means this phy doesn't really implement this call.
> > 
> > This is done is many other subsystems where some function pointers might be
> > optional to be implemented. Just think about the error handling. When we
> > return 0:
> > 
> > ret = usb_phy_set_power(x, 100);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > 	bail();
> > 
> > /* continue */
> > 
> > if we return EOPNOTSUPP:
> > 
> > ret = usb_phy_set_power(x, 100);
> > if (ret < 0 && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > 	bail();
> > 
> > /* continue */
> 
> Got it. You can drop this series for now. I will resend a subset to
> fix IS_ERR_OR_NULL stuff.

yeah, that needs to go, indeed.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux