On Wed, 13 May 2015, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> Lee,
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 May 2015, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> >
> >> Add a binding document for the XUSB host complex on NVIDIA Tegra124
> >> and later SoCs. The XUSB host complex includes a mailbox for
> >> communication with the XUSB micro-controller and an xHCI host-controller.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Changes from v7:
> >> - Move non-shared resources into child nodes.
> >> New for v7.
> >> ---
> >> .../bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..bc50110
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> >> +NVIDIA Tegra XUSB host copmlex
> >> +==============================
> >> +
> >> +The XUSB host complex on Tegra124 and later SoCs contains an xHCI host
> >> +controller and a mailbox for communication with the XUSB micro-controller.
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +--------------------
> >> + - compatible: For Tegra124, must contain "nvidia,tegra124-xusb".
> >> + Otherwise, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-xusb", "nvidia,tegra124-xusb"'
> >> + where <chip> is tegra132.
> >> + - reg: Must contain the base and length of the XUSB FPCI registers.
> >> + - ranges: Bus address mapping for the XUSB block. Can be empty since the
> >> + mapping is 1:1.
> >> + - #address-cells: Must be 2.
> >> + - #size-cells: Must be 2.
> >> +
> >> +Example:
> >> +--------
> >> + usb@0,70098000 {
> >> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xusb";
> >> + reg = <0x0 0x70098000 0x0 0x1000>;
> >> + ranges;
> >> +
> >> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> + usb-host@0,70090000 {
> >> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xhci";
> >> + ...
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + mailbox {
> >> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xusb-mbox";
> >> + ...
> >> + };
> >
> > This doesn't appear to be a proper MFD. I would have the USB and
> > Mailbox devices probe seperately and use a phandle to point the USB
> > device to its Mailbox.
> >
> > usb@xyz {
> > mboxes = <&xusb-mailbox, [chan]>;
> > };
>
> Then what will set up the shared regmap? The point of using an MFD
> here was to share a register set with both the mailbox and xHCI
> drivers and avoid having to map the same register set twice in two
> separate drivers.
Can you share the mapping please?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
