On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 01:14:00AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Fri 2015-02-20 08:39:06, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In current state I review all 3 patches as: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rejected-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > [It breaks booting Nokia N900 device] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next step, figure why it's broken. Working just fine here > > > > > > > > > on AM335x which has the same musb IP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is broken? That is easy. You send 3 patches which broke > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually when I reverted only that patch which adds line: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pm_runtime_irq_safe(musb->controller) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then early boot crash disappeared. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But other two patches did not fixed support for external .ko > > > > > > > gadget modules. State is same -- crash after modprobe. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is crash from qemu when musb is compiled into kernel: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 0.641662] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 > > > > > > [ 0.642211] pgd = c0004000 > > > > ... > > > > > > [ 0.672882] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b > > > > > > [ 0.672882] > > > > > > > > > > > > Reason why it crashes is because when function > > > > > > omap2430_runtime_resume() is called pointer to functions > > > > > > musb_readl and musb_writel are both NULL. And so NULL pointer > > > > > > dereference. > > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/commit/?h=testing/next&id=1861a2c60351a390272b3395f4d88480cdfd9e58 > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you commit a fix to your internal branch without telling Pali, who > > > > is actively debugging same problem at the same time, and then you just > > > > send him url without at least saying "sorry"? > > > > > > grow up... why do I have to say sorry for fixing a problem ? Why do I > > > have to let you know I committed something to my branch ? It's the > > > > Because that's polite thing to do when you break someone elses system? > > when did I break anything from you ? I sent you a patch to test which > you tested and reported it didn't work and the patch was removed from my > queue because of that. After that you completely refused to do any > work/debug related to an itch only *you* had to start with. > > Seen as you just don't care to help yourself, why should I ? > > You're 100% capable of debugging the problems you reported which I ended > up debugging even without having any HW which reproduced the failured. > > Not to mention that since the beginning *you* have been the unpolite > one, completely reluctant to test anything or find logs because, > aparently, that's a waste of your o-so-valuable time. > > So no, you DO NOT deserve any politeness. When you change your attitude > and start scratching your own itches, then we can talk about politeness; > until then, get used to a similarly aggressive attitude towards you. not to mention that you (actually Pali) even reported the crash on a completely unrelated patch. That phonet patch is still correct, and could have been merged during v3.20 merge window. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature