On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 12:53 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 11:29 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > The usbfs API has a peculiar hole: Users are not allowed to reap their > > > URBs after the device has been disconnected. There doesn't seem to be > > > any good reason for this; it is an ad-hoc inconsistency. > > > > How many URBs can you queue this way? > > I don't understand the question. Are you asking how many URBs can be > queued via usbfs? It's limited only by the restriction on the total > memory usage (see usbfs_memory_mb in devio.c). To be absolutely truthful, I am worried about resource leaks. But I cannot really put my finger onto a concrete problem. I see no bug with the patch. Sorry Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
