On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600
> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> > > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },
> >
> > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },
> >
> > please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
> > Acked-by since he's already given it ?
>
> Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch
> (where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.
heh, checkpatch stupidity :-) My bad.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
