On 11/25/2014 06:22 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > It was also looking at reg->no_interrupt. The logic was: > > if (!use_dma_chaining) > ignore reg->no_interrupt > else > check reg->no_interrupt > > The issue is that the implementation under use_dma_chaining does not work. Ah. so upon double checking it really does set the interrupt according to ->no_interrupt. So yes, dropping the module parameter seems to make sense. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
