On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since the PHY of USB3.0 and EHCI/OHCI ch2 are the same, the USB3.0 > driver cannot use the phy driver when the EHCI/OHCI ch2 already used it: > > phy phy-e6590100.usb-phy.3: phy init failed --> -16 > xhci-hcd: probe of ee000000.usb failed with error -16 > > If so, we have to unbind the EHCI/OHCI ch2, and then we have to bind > the USB3.0 driver as the following: > > echo 0000:02:02.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ehci-pci/unbind > echo 0000:02:01.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ohci-pci/unbind > echo ee000000.usb > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/xhci-hcd/bind > > Note that there will be pinctrl-related error messages if both > internal PCI and USB3.0 are enabled but they should be just ignored: > > sh-pfc e6060000.pfc: pin GP_5_22 already requested by ee0d0000.pci; cannot claim for ee000000.usb > sh-pfc e6060000.pfc: pin-182 (ee000000.usb) status -22 > ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > sh-pfc e6060000.pfc: could not request pin 182 (GP_5_22) from group usb2 on device sh-pfc > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) Hi Shimoda-san, Thanks for your patch. I'm fine with this patch as a first step, but I'm wondering what the reason is to prioritize USB 2.0 over USB 3.0? Is the current order just based on device init order? In my mind the expected behavior would be to always use USB 3.0 if it happens to be available in the hardware, specified in the DTS, enabled by the kernel configuration and firmware is loadable. Or does some case exist where it is better to use USB 2.0? I suspect no. So I wonder if you have any plans how to make USB 3.0 enabled by default on Lager? Thanks, / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html