On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 07:35:14PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > 2014-09-17 19:25 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:46:57AM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > >> 2014-09-16 22:39 GMT+04:00 Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > (man, talk about trimming... leave some context ;-) > >> > > >> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:06:33PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > >> >> Ok. What is about musb_io.h? What does it mean "TUSB6010 doesn't allow > >> >> 8-bit access; 16-bit access is the minimum."? > >> > > >> > it means that readb() won't work. > >> > > >> >> I think __raw_readb is kind of return *(u8_t*)(addr), but this is CPU > >> >> stuff as far as I understand. > >> > > >> > tusb6010 is a discrete device connected through GPMC (general purpose > >> > memory controller). Basically, this tells you that tusb6010 cannot > >> > understand 8-bit accesses through gpmc. > >> > > >> > >> So, I checked the stuff in musb_io.h and it doesn't work properly for > >> my BBB. I don't know why. With this tusb6010-custom > >> musb_readb/musb_writeb functions I am not able to mount USB flash > >> drive (the device is being reset constantly, at the same time the > >> webcam works fine). With __raw functions, it is fine. > >> > >> Do you have an idea how this could be refactored? > > > > can't think of a solution off the top of my head. > > Using musb->ops->readb everywhere will add too much overhead probably. correct :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature