On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/10/2014 01:56 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 13:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Note this series is NOT intended for stable, but I accidentally > >> had "cc = stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in my .git/config when sending > >> this series, please ignore for stable. > >> > >> NACK for stable. > > > > If this is not for stable, what do you intend to do about > > the problems in stable? For example patch#01 of this series > > looks like clear stable material to me. > > The plan for stable is mostly, as lame as that is, to make sure > we get all the right quirks in place so that error handling > does not get triggered, for now. How? A medium can be defect. Short of entirely disabling it, error handling will be triggered. > I agree that once this set has seen wider testing, we should > reconsider, and probably add it, to stable. But at this point > in time I'm worried that it may cause regressions, and as such > it is not stable material atm IHMO. Well, we would exchange something known to work imperfectly for something feared to work imperfectly. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
