On Friday 05 September 2014 19:16:36 Peter Griffin wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Sep 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Friday 05 September 2014 18:23:45 Peter Griffin wrote:
> > > +struct st_platform_priv {
> > > + struct clk *clks[USB_MAX_CLKS];
> > > + struct clk *clk48;
> > > + struct reset_control *rst;
> > > + struct reset_control *pwr;
> > > + struct phy *phy;
> > > +};
> >
> > Any reason why this is in a shared header file? It looks like
> > duplicating the structure under two different names would
> > actually be shorter and keep the drivers more readable as they'd
> > be self-contained, even when they have the exact same structure.
>
> The only reason was it was a identical structure so I put it in a shared
> header file. I can unabstract it if you want?
Yes, I think that would be an improvement. Everything looks great to me
otherwise, at least after a brief look.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
