Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 05 Sep 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 18:23:45 Peter Griffin wrote:
> > +struct st_platform_priv {
> > + struct clk *clks[USB_MAX_CLKS];
> > + struct clk *clk48;
> > + struct reset_control *rst;
> > + struct reset_control *pwr;
> > + struct phy *phy;
> > +};
>
> Any reason why this is in a shared header file? It looks like
> duplicating the structure under two different names would
> actually be shorter and keep the drivers more readable as they'd
> be self-contained, even when they have the exact same structure.
The only reason was it was a identical structure so I put it in a shared
header file. I can unabstract it if you want?
>
> Do both drivers use all fields?
Yes they are. I thought the 48Mhz clock would only be used by ohci, but annoyingly it also
clocks the reset logic of the ehci block as well.
regards,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
