On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:08:32AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:13:43AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote: > > > > > > > > If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you > > > > may not need to add this patch. > > > > > > Except if we want to access the OTG member when not using an USB PHY. > > > > If there is no USB PHY, the probe at core.c will turn error. > > I meant if we use a PHY from the common PHY framework (struct phy) and > not one from the USB one (struct usb_phy). The 'struct phy' does not > have a pointer to an OTG structure. > Ok, agree. -- Best Regards, Peter Chen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
