On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:11:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> [ added Alan and Greg to cc: ]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 11:42:25 PM Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Hi Baltlomiej,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > dwc3 driver is using the new Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY driver
> > > (PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD which selects GENERIC_PHY) as can be seen by
> > > looking at the following commits:
> > >
> > > 7a4cf0fde054 ("ARM: dts: Update DWC3 usb controller to use new
> > > phy driver for exynos5250")
> > >
> > > f070267b5fc1 ("ARM: dts: Enable support for DWC3 controller for
> > > exynos5420")
> > >
> > > Thus remove unused usb_phy_generic support from dwc3 Exynos glue
> > > layer.
> > >
> > > [ The code that is being removed is harmful in the context of
> > > multi_v7_defconfig and enabling "EHCI support for Samsung
> > > S5P/EXYNOS SoC Series" (USB_EHCI_EXYNOS) + "OHCI support for
> > > Samsung S5P/EXYNOS SoC Series" (USB_OHCI_EXYNOS) because "EHCI
> > > support for OMAP3 and later chips" (USB_EHCI_HCD_OMAP) selects
> > > "NOP USB Transceiver Driver" (NOP_USB_XCEIV). NOP USB driver
> > > attaches itself to usb_phy_generic platform devices created by
> > > dwc3 Exynos glue layer and later causes Exynos EHCI driver to
> > > fail probe and Exynos OHCI driver to hang on probe (as observed
> > > on Exynos5250 Arndale board). ]
> >
> > The issue with EHCI and OHCI on exynos platforms is that until now
> > they also request
> > usb-phy and only later if they don't find one, they go ahead and get a
> > 'phy' generic.
> >
> > Fortunately we missed this issue with exynos_defconfig, and as you rightly
> > mentioned with multi_v7_defconfig, the NOP_USB_XCEIV gets enabled and
> > EHCI and OHCI exynos get no-op usb-phy, which actually blocks EHCI/OHCI from
> > initializing the real PHYs.
> >
> > This issue is resolved with patches:
> > [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: host: ehci-exynos: Remove unnecessary usb-phy support
> > [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: host: ohci-exynos: Remove unnecessary usb-phy support
> > wherein we are completely removing the usb-phy support from ehci/ohci-exynos.
> > So with these patches we should not see the issue mentioned by you.
>
> Indeed, your patches fix the issue.
>
> Greg, could these two patches ([1] & [2]) get merged quickly, pretty please
> (they were already acked by Alan)? They are not a mere cleanups because
> they fix the actual problem with using multi_v7_defconfig which in turn has
> been blocking Olof's defconfig update patch [3] for quite some time now.
> Moreover these patches are limited to Exynos host drivers so they should be
> pretty safe when it comes to potential regressions.
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg112294.html
> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg112293.html
> [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg349654.html
merged for 3.18-rc1, or do you "need" them for 3.17-final?
I already reverted one patch for exynos for 3.17-final that is sitting
in my tree to go to Linus soon as you all didn't seem to want it
anymore, so I'm getting really confused here...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
