Hi, On 07/30/2014 04:48 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Laszlo T. wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I ran some commands and recorded them: >> -checking with cfdisk >> -mounting the ntfs partition >> -some reading on it >> -unmounting >> -and the unsuccessful ext4 filesystem creating >> >> http://pastebin.com/xmKnwPF5 > > Hans, after looking at this usbmon trace I have to wonder: Why on earth > does uas submit so many URBs for the status endpoint? Why not use just > a small pool of URBs, and resubmit each one as it completes? To keep the usb2 and usb3 code-paths (mostly) identical, for usb3 we need to submit one status urb per outstanding command as the status endpoint uses bulk streams, and we need to queue up an urb on each stream (tag) for which we've an outstanding command. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
