W dniu 16.07.2014 16:45, Felipe Balbi pisze:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:58:31AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 07/14/2014 12:36 PM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
<snip>
Since target and its userland tool (targetcli) is available for
sometime now, maybe a look on those will give an idea on how the
problem has been solved once _and_ whether it is good or not.
I agree with Sebastian here. At the end of the day, we don't expect
users to go fiddle with configfs directly and rather use libgadget
through a tool that uses it.
I don't have a strong opinion here, either.
It is libusbg (that's how the library is actually called now) that
should now. The thing is _how_ it should know: it can either be
given a config file, or discover what's available.
I believe we should take the best from both worlds:
- there is a config file distributed with libusbg,
- there is some generic way to handle functions not known
at the moment of library's release
@Krzysztof:
@Matt:
what do you think?
AP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
