On 07/10/2014 04:17 PM, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote: >> another class ? Please don't, we already have the udc class, we >> could find a way to just use that instead. >> > > Using udc clas is not a good idea. This may cause failures in userspace. failures? like what? > How would you like to tell that this is not really a udc? Only type of Adding a new class for one file does not look right. Try to add a file if you have to but without creating a new class for it. It looks like it would fit best in the configfs root directory. However, I am not sure this is required at all. I would rather prefer having a userland tool (like target has) which helps you assembling a gadget instead of having users poking at files and then "eh look! lets see what this can do…". Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
