> > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:57:39PM +0800, Li Jun wrote: > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:18:36PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > + Robin and David, > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig > > > index cb8e991..9081757 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig > > > @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ config USB_OTG > > > config USB_OTG_WHITELIST > > > bool "Rely on OTG Targeted Peripherals List" > > > depends on USB_OTG || EXPERT > > > - default y if USB_OTG > > > help > > > If you say Y here, the "otg_whitelist.h" file will be used > as a > > > product whitelist, so USB peripherals not listed there will > be > > > > > > Shawn > > As Peter suggested, do not enable OTG_FSM in defconfig since there are > very few > > HNP&SRP capable device in market. With OTG_FSM enabled, even > USB_OTG_WHITELIST > > is not selected, the OTG port still can't work the same as before if > you connect > > a normal usb device to it. > > If a device is not HNP/SRP capable then it should not be used on this > device. If we can't detect this during runtime then there should be some > devicetree property for that. Making such decisions during compile time > is not an option in the days of multimachine kernels. > > Sascha > I don't think OTG option should be set for multi-machine kernel configurations, the otg device will not be server, and it is a customized device (eg, the Targeted Peripherals List need to be updated when it goes to be product). Felipe, what's your opinion? Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
