On 9 April 2014 19:53, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>
>> Alan Stern wrote:
>> > The IN transfer was 1 frame long and scheduled for frame 1123, so its
>> > completion indicates that the current frame number is >= 1123. The OUT
>> > transfer was 6 frames long and scheduled for frame 1111, so it should
>> > have completed in frame 1117. But the timestamps show that the two
>> > URBs completed at the same time (only 13 us between them).
>>
>
> Furthermore, I clearly recall Sarah Sharp (the original maintainer for
> xhci-hcd) saying that the support for isochronous transfers needed
> attention. This may well be an example.
>
> Alan Stern
>
Hi,
Is there any progress on this or is it low priority?
BR
Russel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
