Hi, On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14.04.2014 15:05, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday 14 April 2014 05:35 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> >>> Hi Kishon, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 04:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Vivek, >>>>> >>>>> Please see my comments inline. >>>>> >>>>> On 08.04.2014 16:36, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Add a new driver for the USB 3.0 PHY on Exynos5 series of SoCs. >>>>>> The new driver uses the generic PHY framework and will interact >>>>>> with DWC3 controller present on Exynos5 series of SoCs. >>>>>> Thereby, removing old phy-samsung-usb3 driver and related code >>>>>> used untill now which was based on usb/phy framework. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt | 42 ++ >>>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 11 + >>>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + >>>>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 668 >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> 4 files changed, 722 insertions(+) >>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>> + Additional clock required for Exynos5420: >>>>>> + - usb30_sclk_100m: Additional special clock used for PHY >>>>>> operation >>>>>> + depicted as 'sclk_usbphy30' in CMU of Exynos5420. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure this isn't simply a gate for the ref clock, as it can be >>>>> found on >>>>> another SoC that is not upstream yet? I don't have documentation for >>>>> Exynos >>>>> 5420 so I can't tell, but I'd like to ask you to recheck this. >>>>> >>>>>> +- samsung,syscon-phandle: phandle for syscon interface, which is used >>>>>> to >>>>>> + control pmu registers for power isolation. >>>>>> +- samsung,pmu-offset: phy power control register offset to >>>>>> pmu-system-controller >>>>>> + base. >>>>>> +- #phy-cells : from the generic PHY bindings, must be 1; >>>>>> + >>>>>> +For "samsung,exynos5250-usbdrd-phy" and >>>>>> "samsung,exynos5420-usbdrd-phy" >>>>>> +compatible PHYs, the second cell in the PHY specifier identifies the >>>>>> +PHY id, which is interpreted as follows: >>>>>> + 0 - UTMI+ type phy, >>>>>> + 1 - PIPE3 type phy, >>>>>> + >>>>>> +Example: >>>>>> + usb3_phy: usbphy@12100000 { >>>>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbdrd-phy"; >>>>>> + reg = <0x12100000 0x100>; >>>>>> + clocks = <&clock 286>, <&clock 1>; >>>>>> + clock-names = "phy", "usb3phy_refclk"; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Binding description above doesn't mention "usb3phy_refclk" entry. >>>>> >>>>>> + samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_syscon>; >>>>>> + samsung,pmu-offset = <0x704>; >>>>>> + #phy-cells = <1>; >>>>>> + }; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c >>>>>> b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 0000000..ff54a7c >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>> +static int exynos5_usbdrd_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >>>>>> + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node; >>>>>> + struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd; >>>>>> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider; >>>>>> + struct resource *res; >>>>>> + const struct of_device_id *match; >>>>>> + const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata *drv_data; >>>>>> + struct regmap *reg_pmu; >>>>>> + u32 pmu_offset; >>>>>> + int i; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * Exynos systems are completely DT enabled, >>>>>> + * so lets not have any platform data support for this driver. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + if (!node) { >>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "no device node found\n"); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This error message is not very meaningful. I'd rather use something >>>>> like "This >>>>> driver can be only instantiated using Device Tree". >>>> >>>> >>>> how about just adding depend_on OF in Kconfig? >>> >>> >>> Already added a depend on 'OF'. Copying below the part of Kconfig in this >>> patch. >> >> >> Alright.. Do we need the check then? If config_OF is enabled devices will >> be >> created using device tree no? > > > Not necessarily. Enabling support for OF doesn't mean that it is the only > boot method that can be used. Legacy board files may be still available. I'm > not sure why someone would try to instantiate this driver from them, though. True, we don't have a scope of instantiating this driver using old platform device and old legacy board files. So we don't need this check then, right ? -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html