Hi,
On Thursday 20 March 2014 07:52 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/19/2014 09:08 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 18 March 2014 05:34 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> This patch remove unnecessary function call in of_extcon_get_extcon_dev()
>>> by using the name of device_node structure.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c | 12 ++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c
>>> index 72173ec..0a29f82 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c
>>> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct extcon_dev *of_extcon_get_extcon_dev(struct device *dev, int index)
>>> {
>>> struct device_node *node;
>>> struct extcon_dev *edev;
>>> - struct platform_device *extcon_parent_dev;
>>>
>>> if (!dev->of_node) {
>>> dev_dbg(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
>>> @@ -46,16 +45,9 @@ struct extcon_dev *of_extcon_get_extcon_dev(struct device *dev, int index)
>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - extcon_parent_dev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
>>> - if (!extcon_parent_dev) {
>>> - dev_dbg(dev, "unable to find device by node\n");
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev(dev_name(&extcon_parent_dev->dev));
>>> + edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev(node->name);
>>
>> Since you no longer want to use device names I think you should add this too to
>> warn users if they rely on using the device name.
>
> Previous of_extcon_get_extcon_dev() support only platform device using of_find_device_by_node.
>
> If extcon device is based on i2c/spi/pci and so on, of_extcon_get_extcon_dev() can't
> find device instance for device name. So, I change device name from the name of platform device
> to the name of dt node.
That's fine. But we have to fix extcon_dev_register() too, to not use device
names right? We have to warn extcon users not to use device names right?
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
>> index bc4c789..025eb39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
>> @@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>> edev->dev.class = extcon_class;
>> edev->dev.release = extcon_dev_release;
>>
>> - edev->name = edev->name ? edev->name : dev_name(edev->dev.parent);
>> //The user should always pass the 'name' as we no longer use device name while
>> getting extcon device. And this name should also be the 'node' name?
>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(edev->name)) {
>> dev_err(&edev->dev,
>> "extcon device name is null\n");
>>
>> Btw changing to node name from device name breaks dwc3 in OMAP5 and you would
>> need this too..
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>> index 2aea4bc..cea8cd3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> palmas_usb->edev.supported_cable = palmas_extcon_cable;
>> palmas_usb->edev.dev.parent = palmas_usb->dev;
>> + palmas_usb->edev.name = "palmas_usb";
>> palmas_usb->edev.mutually_exclusive = mutually_exclusive;
>>
>> status = extcon_dev_register(&palmas_usb->edev);
>>
>> Cheers
>> Kishon
>>
>
> If node name is same as extcon device name, don't need some modification.
> Also, you can modify node name in some OMAP dts file insead of modification of extcon-palmas.c
node name in OMAP dts is already 'palmas_usb'. But since we were not setting
'edev.name' in extcon-palmas.c, extcon_dev_register used device name of palmas
(palmas_usb.7 in my case). So extcon-palmas.c needs the fix.
Cheers
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
