From: hayeswang <hayeswang@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:24:50 +0800 > Besides, I don't wish to modify the setting by ethtool when re-loading > the driver or rebooting every time. You have code to reset the driver, you can do it when the user asks for the setting to be changed via ethtool. I do not see this as a problem. The ethtool change can occur while the driver is already up, you'll just need to reset the chip and make the new configuration, this is not a problem. > Excuse me. Why is it not accepted for being a Kconfig parameter. > It let the manufactuers of some platforms, especially the embedded > system, could tune their performance. Should I give up this patch? We want to discourage such hard-coding, not encourage it. I think you are limiting yourself unnecessarily by refusing to consider that there may be ways other than Kconfig to adjust this setting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
