From: David Miller [mailto:davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:08 PM [...] > >> And I fundamentally disagree with this being a Kconfig parameter. > >> > >> Make it run-time calculated _or_ settable via ethtool. > > > > Excuse me. How should I make it run-time calculated without a > > Kconfig parameter? Should I use module_param? > > You run-time determine the setting based upon the negotiated link > speed and traffic patterns. It is difficult to design a algorithm which considers the hardware of the platform, network traffic, and even the USB behavior to dynamically modify the setting. I don't think I have the capability to do it. Besides, I don't wish to modify the setting by ethtool when re-loading the driver or rebooting every time. Excuse me. Why is it not accepted for being a Kconfig parameter. It let the manufactuers of some platforms, especially the embedded system, could tune their performance. Should I give up this patch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
